New lint: iter_next_slice #5597
Conversation
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #5563) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
flip1995
added
the
S-waiting-on-author
esamudera
force-pushed
the
slice_iter_next
branch
from
71f51ad
to
a5bad06
Compare
| @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ | |||
| #![warn(clippy::iter_next_slice)] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| #![warn(clippy::iter_next_slice)] | |
| // run-rustfix | |
| #![warn(clippy::iter_next_slice)] |
and a update-all-references.sh run and this PR should be finished.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Okay, I have added the run-rustfix marker and iter_next_slice.fixed in the new commit.
However, the test failed at Clippy Test, cargo build stage. I'm not sure about the errors listed, is it about toolchain version incompatibility? Should I rebase this branch to the latest master?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You may have to rebase after #5665 is merged. In the meantime you could go ahead, remove the "WIP" prefixes from your commits and remove the "draft" status from this PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Okay, I have squashed all the commits into one, and have updated this PR status to Open.
esamudera
force-pushed
the
slice_iter_next
branch
from
e388a24
to
32fde0b
Compare
|
The test results are in and perfect! Looks like this PR is done. Thank you @flip1995 for your instructions and for accommodating newcomers like me, I will use this PR as a reference to work on other issues 👍 |
|
Thanks for your contribution! Always happy to get new contributors on their way. @bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 32fde0b has been approved by |
New lint: iter_next_slice Hello, this is a work-in-progress PR for issue: #5572 I have implemented lint to replace `iter().next()` for `slice[index..]` and `array` with `get(index)` and `get(0)` respectively. However since I made a lot of changes, I would like to request some feedback before continuing so that I could fix mistakes. Thank you! --- changelog: - implement iter next slice lint and test - modify needless_continues, for_loop_over_options_result UI tests since they have `iter().next()`
|
💔 Test failed - checks-action_test |
|
@bors retry |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test |
|
I think the issue linked to this PR can be closed manually. On a side note @esamudera , you can setup a PR to automatically close an issue when merged by adding a line in your PR description (like you did for changelog): It works also with |
|
Okay, thank you for the tip, I will add the issue keyword on my next PR 👍 |
Hello, this is a work-in-progress PR for issue: #5572
I have implemented lint to replace
iter().next()forslice[index..]andarraywithget(index)andget(0)respectively. However since I made a lot of changes, I would like to request some feedback before continuing so that I could fix mistakes.Thank you!
changelog: implement
iter_next_slicelint and test, and modifyneedless_continues,for_loop_over_options_resultUI tests since they haveiter().next()